Nuclear Power and Data Centers: The Future’s Energy Solution?

In the shadow of Oregon’s wind-swept plains and Washington’s rugged landscapes, a quiet revolution is brewing—one powered not by the breeze but by the atom. Amazon, a titan of technology and commerce, has unveiled plans to harness small modular reactors (SMRs) in Washington to fuel its sprawling data centers across the border in Oregon. This audacious move sidesteps Oregon’s decades-old ban on nuclear power, offering a tantalizing glimpse into a future where nuclear energy might solve the insatiable power demands of our digital age. But is this the transformative solution the industry craves, or a risky gamble cloaked in green ambition?

Data centers, those humming nerve centers of cloud computing and artificial intelligence, are straining global energy grids, consuming an estimated 1% of the world’s electricity—a figure poised to double by 2030. As Amazon races toward its pledge of net-zero carbon emissions by 2040, its pivot to nuclear power raises profound questions. What can small modular reactors offer an industry desperate for reliable, sustainable energy? And how does this bold strategy intersect with its wind-powered expansion in tiny Arlington, Oregon? This exploration dives deep into the promise, peril, and potential of nuclear power as the data center’s next frontier.

Background: Data Centers and the Energy Challenge

The Power Hunger of Data Centers

Beneath the sleek interfaces of streaming services and cloud storage lies a voracious beast. A single hyperscale data center can devour 20 to 100 megawatts of power—enough to light a small city—translating to 175,000 to 876,000 megawatt-hours annually. Cooling systems, server racks, and backup generators drive this relentless appetite, making energy the linchpin of operational success. As artificial intelligence and global connectivity surge, the International Energy Agency forecasts data center energy use could climb to 4% of global demand by decade’s end, a clarion call for innovation.

Sustainability Pressure

The environmental toll is stark. Many data centers remain tethered to fossil fuel grids, casting a long carbon shadow. In Oregon’s Umatilla and Morrow counties, Amazon’s facilities have turned a small utility into one of the state’s top polluters, its coal-heavy power supply clashing with the tech giant’s green rhetoric. Investors, regulators, and consumers now demand cleaner alternatives, pushing companies like Amazon to rethink their energy playbook. Renewables like wind and solar have made strides, but their intermittency leaves gaps that threaten uptime—a non-negotiable for data centers.

Amazon’s Oregon Footprint

Amazon’s presence in Oregon is vast and growing. With 10 data centers operational in Umatilla and Morrow counties and plans for 10 more, the company has invested $15 billion in its cloud region. Its latest venture, a 400-acre expansion in Arlington, leans on wind power from the Leaning Juniper IIA Wind Farm. Yet, the nuclear gambit in Washington signals a broader strategy, one that could redefine how Amazon powers its digital empire across state lines.

Understanding Small Modular Reactors (SMRs)

What Are SMRs?

Small modular reactors are the nuclear industry’s answer to a changing world. Unlike their massive forebears, which can exceed 1,000 megawatts, SMRs cap at 300 megawatts per unit. Designed for factory assembly and transport, they promise reduced construction timelines and costs. Companies like NuScale Power and Oklo Inc. lead the charge, with designs approved by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, heralding a new era of compact nuclear power.

How They Work

SMRs harness nuclear fission, splitting uranium atoms to release heat that generates steam, driving turbines for electricity. Their innovation lies in scale and safety. Passive cooling systems, which operate without external power, mitigate meltdown risks—a lesson from disasters like Fukushima. Refueling cycles stretch up to 30 years, minimizing downtime. These features make SMRs a plug-and-play option for remote or high-demand sites, like data centers.

Global Context

The world is watching. Canada, Russia, and China are testing SMRs, while the U.S. has allocated billions through the Department of Energy to accelerate development. NuScale’s Utah project aims for operation by 2029, and Oklo’s microreactors—some as small as 1.5 megawatts—target niche applications. As climate goals tighten, SMRs stand poised to bridge the gap between renewables and fossil fuels, a potential game-changer for energy-intensive industries.

Why Nuclear Power for Data Centers?

Advantages of SMRs

SMRs offer a trifecta of benefits tailored to data centers. First, their reliability is unmatched—a capacity factor above 90% ensures steady power, dwarfing wind’s 35% and solar’s 25%. Second, they emit no greenhouse gases during operation, aligning with Amazon’s net-zero pledge. Third, their scalability allows a single 300-megawatt unit to power a large facility or multiple smaller ones, offering flexibility as demand grows. For Amazon, this could mean energy independence, unshackling its data centers from strained grids.

Comparison to Renewables

Wind and solar, while clean, falter under scrutiny for data centers. Arlington’s wind farm delivers over 200,000 megawatt-hours annually, but its output waxes and wanes with the weather, necessitating backups or storage. SMRs, by contrast, run ceaselessly, their output predictable and robust. Yet, renewables boast lower upfront costs—$1,500 to $2,000 per kilowatt versus SMRs’ $5,000 to $10,000—making them a cheaper entry point, if less dependable.

Amazon’s Vision

Amazon sees nuclear as a cornerstone of its sustainability puzzle. Its Oregon data centers, including those in fossil-reliant Umatilla and Morrow, strain local grids and tarnish its green image. SMRs in Washington could deliver clean, stable power across the Western Interconnection, supporting its 100% renewable energy goal by 2025—not through direct nuclear use in Oregon, but by offsetting dirtier sources elsewhere. It’s a strategic hedge against renewable limitations.

Risks and Challenges of SMRs

High Costs

The nuclear dream comes with a steep price tag. Building an SMR can cost $5,000 to $10,000 per kilowatt, far exceeding traditional nuclear’s economies of scale or renewables’ affordability. Early projects, like NuScale’s, have seen costs balloon—its Utah plant’s price tag rose from $3 billion to $9 billion. For Amazon, the return on investment hinges on long-term savings and carbon credits, a calculus still unproven at scale.

Regulatory Hurdles

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission wields a heavy hand. Licensing an SMR can take five to ten years, factoring in design approvals, environmental reviews, and public hearings. Washington’s permissive stance on nuclear contrasts with Oregon’s ban, but cross-state transmission adds complexity—grid operators must approve and integrate the power flow. Delays could stall Amazon’s timeline, testing its patience and budget.

Safety and Waste Concerns

Safety remains nuclear’s Achilles’ heel. SMRs tout passive cooling and smaller fuel loads as safeguards, reducing meltdown risks. Yet, no system is infallible—accidents, however rare, carry catastrophic potential. Waste is thornier. Each reactor produces radioactive byproducts needing secure storage for centuries, a logistical and ethical burden unresolved despite decades of debate. Amazon must navigate these shadows with transparency.

Public Perception

Nuclear power conjures ghosts of Chernobyl and Three Mile Island. Communities near proposed SMR sites in Washington may balk, fearing radiation or property value drops. Amazon’s renewable success in Arlington shows it can win local buy-in, but nuclear’s stigma demands a different playbook—public forums, safety assurances, and economic incentives will be key.

Amazon’s SMR Strategy in Action

The Washington Plan

In October 2024, Amazon announced a partnership with Oklo Inc. and other nuclear innovators to deploy SMRs in Washington state. The plan targets a pilot facility by 2029, leveraging Washington’s nuclear-friendly policies and proximity to Oregon’s data centers. Initial capacity could range from 15 megawatts (Oklo’s microreactors) to 300 megawatts (larger SMRs), with plans to scale based on success.

Powering Oregon Data Centers

Oregon’s 1980 ballot measure bans new nuclear plants, a legacy of anti-nuclear sentiment. Amazon’s workaround is elegant: build in Washington, transmit power via the Western Interconnection grid to Umatilla and Morrow counties. This cross-state flow could stabilize Oregon’s energy mix, where the Umatilla Electric Cooperative’s coal reliance has spiked emissions. It’s a legal and logistical tightrope, but one Amazon seems poised to walk.

Partnerships and Players

Oklo Inc., with its compact Aurora reactor, brings agility—its 1.5 to 15-megawatt units suit smaller loads, though scaling to hyperscale needs remains untested. NuScale’s 77-megawatt modules offer a middle ground, already NRC-approved. Amazon’s collaboration blends these pioneers’ expertise, betting on a diversified nuclear portfolio to meet its needs.

The Arlington Connection

Wind-Powered Arlington

Arlington, Oregon, stands apart. Its 400-acre data center, acquired in 2024, draws over 200,000 megawatt-hours annually from the Leaning Juniper IIA Wind Farm. Served by PacifiCorp—an investor-owned utility under Oregon’s clean-energy mandates—it’s a renewable success story, distinct from the fossil-heavy Umatilla and Morrow sites. Nuclear isn’t on Arlington’s horizon, but its role in Amazon’s Oregon strategy is pivotal.

Indirect Nuclear Influence

The SMR plan doesn’t directly power Arlington, yet its impact ripples. Washington’s nuclear output could ease grid pressure across the region, indirectly benefiting PacifiCorp’s mix and stabilizing power for wind-reliant sites. If successful, this dual approach—wind in Arlington, nuclear elsewhere—could model a hybrid energy future, balancing renewable variability with nuclear constancy.

Oregon’s Nuclear Ban

Oregon’s ban, enacted via Measure 7 in 1980, reflects a post-Three Mile Island aversion. It prohibits new nuclear facilities until a permanent waste repository exists, a condition unmet decades later. Amazon’s Washington pivot respects this limit, using geography to its advantage. The ban shapes its strategy, forcing a regional lens that Arlington’s wind success complements.

Advantages of SMRs for Data Centers

Unmatched Reliability

Data centers live or die by uptime. SMRs deliver with a capacity factor above 90%, meaning they run near full tilt year-round. Wind’s 35% factor, as seen in Arlington, requires backups; nuclear needs none. For Amazon, this could mean fewer outages and happier cloud customers.

Environmental Benefits

Each megawatt-hour from an SMR avoids coal’s 0.9 tons of CO2 emissions. Scaling to 300 megawatts, a single reactor could cut millions of tons annually, dwarfing wind’s intermittent gains. In Oregon, where Umatilla’s utility belches pollution, this shift could rewrite Amazon’s environmental ledger.

Strategic Flexibility

A 300-megawatt SMR could power a hyperscale facility or split output across sites, adapting to growth. Arlington’s wind farm is site-specific; nuclear offers portability via grid ties. For Amazon’s expanding Oregon network, this flexibility could streamline planning.

Risks in Focus: A Closer Look

Economic Feasibility

The math is daunting. A 300-megawatt SMR at $5,000 per kilowatt costs $1.5 billion upfront—viable only if long-term savings outpace renewables. Amazon’s deep pockets can absorb this, but smaller operators may flinch. Subsidies or carbon pricing could tip the scales, yet both remain uncertain.

Safety in Question

SMRs promise safety through design—passive cooling kicks in if power fails, and smaller cores limit fallout. Still, rare failures could devastate. Amazon must prove these safeguards to regulators and locals, a task its wind projects never faced.

Waste Management Realities

Nuclear waste lingers for millennia. SMRs produce less per unit than large reactors, but disposal sites like Yucca Mountain remain stalled. Amazon’s sustainability ethos demands a plan—temporary storage or future recycling—lest nuclear undermines its green cred.

The Future of Nuclear-Powered Data Centers

Scaling Nuclear Power

If costs drop—say, to $3,000 per kilowatt via mass production—SMRs could rival wind and solar. Regulatory streamlining, as pushed by the Biden administration, might hasten deployment. By 2035, nuclear could power a fifth of U.S. data centers, a seismic shift from today’s fringe status.

Industry Trends

Amazon isn’t alone. Microsoft’s 2022 deal with TerraPower for nuclear research signals a trend. Google’s carbon-free goals could follow suit. As tech giants chase sustainability, nuclear’s reliability makes it a dark horse in the green race.

What’s Next for Amazon

Arlington’s wind success and Washington’s SMR bet suggest a hybrid future. By 2030, Amazon might blend nuclear baseloads with renewable peaks, optimizing across Oregon. If SMRs prove out, expect retrofits elsewhere—its global data centers could go nuclear, redefining tech’s energy map.

Conclusion: A Balanced Energy Future?

Nuclear power for data centers is no panacea, but it’s a potent contender. Amazon’s SMR strategy marries reliability with sustainability, sidestepping Oregon’s ban to power its digital ambitions. Arlington’s wind triumph shows renewables’ strength; Washington’s nuclear push reveals their limits. Together, they offer a roadmap—diversify, innovate, adapt. The risks are real—cost, safety, waste—but so is the reward: a decarbonized, resilient tech backbone. Is nuclear the future? Perhaps not alone, but as part of the mix, it’s a solution worth watching.

What’s your take? Could nuclear power your data center—or your conscience?

For further reading and to explore the companies driving this revolution:

For our other articles on this topic:

FAQ

Q: What are small modular reactors (SMRs)?
A: SMRs are compact nuclear reactors, up to 300 megawatts, designed for factory production with enhanced safety features like passive cooling.

Q: Why is Amazon using SMRs in Washington instead of Oregon?
A: Oregon’s 1980 ban on new nuclear plants forces Amazon to build in Washington, transmitting power to Oregon data centers via the grid.

Q: How do SMRs compare to wind power for data centers?
A: SMRs offer constant, high-capacity power with zero emissions, unlike wind’s intermittent output, but they cost more upfront.

Q: What are the biggest risks of SMRs?
A: High costs, regulatory delays, safety concerns, and nuclear waste management pose significant challenges.

Q: Could Arlington’s data center use nuclear power?
A: Not directly—Arlington relies on wind, but Washington’s SMRs could indirectly enhance Oregon’s grid, benefiting all sites.